HyperWhisper Blog
HyperWhisper vs Typeless: Which Voice-to-Text App Is Better in 2026?
February 12, 2026
Choosing the right voice-to-text app can make or break your productivity. Two popular options for macOS users are HyperWhisper and Typeless, both offering AI-powered speech-to-text dictation with claims of strong privacy. But when you look under the hood, HyperWhisper and Typeless differ significantly in transparency, pricing, and how they actually handle your data.
This comparison of HyperWhisper vs Typeless breaks down everything you need to know to make an informed decision.
Privacy: HyperWhisper vs Typeless
Privacy is the most important factor when choosing a voice dictation app. You're trusting these tools with everything you say out loud, from sensitive business conversations to personal notes.
HyperWhisper: Verifiable Privacy
HyperWhisper takes a privacy-first approach that you can actually verify:
- True offline mode: HyperWhisper includes local Whisper and NVIDIA Parakeet models for transcription, plus Gemma models for post-processing, all running entirely on your device. When using offline mode, zero data leaves your Mac. The only time HyperWhisper ever needs an internet connection is for a one-time license key validation when you first activate Pro. After that, every step of the transcription pipeline — recording, voice detection, speech-to-text, and post-processing — runs fully offline with no network calls.
- User-controlled cloud: When you opt into cloud transcription, you choose your provider (OpenAI, Deepgram, Groq, ElevenLabs, and others). You know exactly where your data goes.
- No account required: You can download and use HyperWhisper without creating an account or providing any personal information.
- No tracking: HyperWhisper does not collect usage analytics, browsing data, or any information beyond what's needed for transcription.
- Verifiable claims: Because HyperWhisper offers genuine on-device processing, anyone can confirm that audio stays local by monitoring network traffic.
Typeless: Privacy Questions
Typeless markets itself with phrases like "zero data retention" and "on-device history." However, independent technical analysis has raised concerns:
- Cloud-dependent processing: Typeless does not include any local speech recognition models. All audio is compressed and sent to cloud servers for processing, despite marketing that implies on-device capabilities.
- Broad data collection: Technical analysis of the Typeless application has revealed capabilities for collecting data well beyond what a voice dictation tool needs, including focused app names, window titles, website URLs, and clipboard contents.
- Excessive permissions: Typeless requests access to screen recording, camera, Bluetooth, and accessibility APIs in addition to the microphone. A voice typing tool should not need screen recording or camera access.
- Opaque corporate structure: Typeless does not publicly disclose the legal entity behind the product, a registered business address, or any third-party security audits (such as SOC 2 or ISO 27001).
These findings come from a detailed reverse engineering analysis shared publicly on X, where a security researcher examined the Typeless v0.9.3 binary, network communications, local database, and native libraries on macOS.
When comparing HyperWhisper vs Typeless on privacy, HyperWhisper offers verifiable, transparent privacy while Typeless relies on marketing language that does not match what technical analysis has found.
Pricing: HyperWhisper vs Typeless
Cost matters, especially if you use voice dictation daily.
| Feature | HyperWhisper | Typeless |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 3 minutes/day with offline mode | 4,000 words/week (cloud only) |
| Paid plan | $39 one-time (lifetime) | $12/month ($144/year) or $30/month |
| Subscriptions | None | Required for unlimited use |
| Offline use | Yes (included in free tier) | Not available |
HyperWhisper's one-time $39 payment gives you lifetime access to unlimited transcription, all modes, and cloud credits. Compare that to Typeless, where you'll pay $144 per year at the discounted annual rate, or $360 per year monthly. Over two years, Typeless costs 7x more than HyperWhisper.
HyperWhisper's free plan gives you 3 minutes per day of transcription across both offline and cloud modes — enough to experience the full product daily. Typeless caps free users at 4,000 words per week and requires an internet connection for all transcription.
Features: HyperWhisper vs Typeless
Both HyperWhisper and Typeless offer AI-powered dictation, but their feature sets differ in important ways.
Transcription Modes
HyperWhisper provides built-in modes for common workflows: Meeting, Email, Note, Code, Legal, and Medical. Pro users can create unlimited custom modes with specific formatting rules, vocabulary, and writing styles.
Typeless offers context-aware tone adjustment that adapts based on which app you're using. This is automatic but gives you less control than HyperWhisper's explicit mode system.
Custom Vocabulary
HyperWhisper lets you add specialized terms, names, acronyms, and jargon to improve recognition accuracy. This is especially valuable for professionals in technical, legal, or medical fields. Custom vocabulary works with both local and cloud transcription.
Typeless offers a custom dictionary feature, but only on the paid Pro plan.
Language Support
Both apps support 100+ languages. HyperWhisper includes automatic language detection that works in both offline and cloud modes. Typeless supports mixed-language dictation in its Pro tier.
Platform Support
HyperWhisper is available on macOS (stable) and Windows (beta), with full offline capability on both platforms.
Typeless is currently macOS-only, with Windows, iOS, Android, and web versions listed as "coming soon."
Processing Options
HyperWhisper offers genuine flexibility:
- Fully offline transcription with multiple model families:
- 11 Whisper models (via whisper.cpp) ranging from Tiny (39 MB) to Large v3 (3.1 GB), with both multilingual and English-only variants including the fast Large v3 Turbo (809 MB)
- NVIDIA Parakeet models (via FluidAudio) optimized for Apple Neural Engine: Parakeet V2 for high-recall English transcription and Parakeet V3 for 25 European languages, both under 500 MB
- True offline post-processing: Download Gemma 3 models locally (1B, 4B, or 12B parameters in quantized GGUF format) to clean up, reformat, and polish your transcriptions entirely on-device. No cloud required for any step of the pipeline, from speech recognition to final text output.
- Built-in voice activity detection: Silero VAD runs locally to intelligently detect speech segments before transcription, reducing processing overhead
- HyperWhisper Cloud: Built-in cloud service with edge processing across 17 global regions
- Bring your own API key: Connect to OpenAI, Deepgram, Groq, ElevenLabs, AssemblyAI, Fireworks AI, and more
In total, HyperWhisper ships with access to 16 downloadable local models across three categories (speech-to-text, post-processing, and voice detection), giving you a fully offline pipeline from microphone to polished text.
Typeless processes all audio through its own cloud servers. There is no offline option, no local models, and no ability to choose your transcription provider.
Speed and Accuracy: HyperWhisper vs Typeless
HyperWhisper achieves sub-700ms latency with its cloud transcription and delivers 99% accuracy with state-of-the-art AI models. Custom vocabulary further boosts accuracy for specialized use cases.
Typeless is also praised for fast transcription speeds. Both apps include AI post-processing features like filler word removal and self-correction handling.
The key difference is that HyperWhisper gives you the choice between speed (cloud) and privacy (local), while Typeless only offers cloud processing.
Trust and Transparency: HyperWhisper vs Typeless
When you choose a voice dictation app, you're trusting it with your spoken words. Transparency matters.
HyperWhisper:
- Clear product documentation and help center
- Identifiable developer behind the product
- Privacy claims are independently verifiable
- No hidden data collection beyond transcription
Typeless:
- No publicly disclosed legal entity name
- Business address limited to a jurisdiction reference
- Domain registration behind privacy services
- No published security audits or certifications
- Terms of service prohibit reverse engineering, making independent verification difficult
The Verdict: HyperWhisper Is the Better Choice
When comparing HyperWhisper vs Typeless across every dimension that matters, HyperWhisper comes out ahead:
- Better privacy: True offline mode with verifiable claims, versus cloud-only processing with questions about data collection scope
- Better value: $39 once versus $144+/year in subscriptions
- More flexibility: Offline, cloud, or bring-your-own-API versus cloud-only with no provider choice
- More transparency: Clear documentation, identifiable developer, and verifiable privacy versus opaque corporate structure
- More control: Explicit custom modes and vocabulary versus automatic-only context adaptation
If you value your privacy and want a voice-to-text app that delivers professional-grade transcription without recurring fees or unanswered questions about your data, HyperWhisper is the clear winner.
Download HyperWhisper free and experience the difference for yourself.